The Potentials of the Jigsaw Approach: A Study on Saudi Female EFL Learners' Perspectives, Experiences, and Attitudes Towards Their Reading Comprehension Skills
Keywords:
A study on Saudi female EFL learners' perspectives, experiences, and attitudes, reading comprehension skills, the potential of the jigsaw approachAbstract
The jigsaw approach encourages peer interaction and peer tutoring that enhance learners’ interpersonal skills through learning to cooperate in small cooperative groups. The design is particularly utilized in language classrooms to maximize students’ social interaction, learning productivity, engagement, teamwork skills, and proficiency in language skills. This study seeks to evaluate the perceptions of Saudi female EFL students regarding the efficacy of the Jigsaw method and its influence on their reading comprehension difficulties and anxiety. The researcher created a quantitative tool to gather data from the participants. A 40-item Likert scale of strongly disagree to strongly agree was used to generate statistical results from the participants’ perspectives. The study involved both control and experimental groups to assess how Jigsaw influences the social, emotional, and academic abilities of learners. The opinionnaire was distributed to one hundred and ten (n=110) female EFL learners at a Saudi Undergraduate University to record their opinions on the jigsaw approach’s efficacy. The statistical results show that the participants greatly admired the idea of working collaboratively with their peers to internalize learning and achieve their mutual goals. However, the participants negatively responded to the concept eliciting their knowledge of vocabulary, grammar, and the recognition of the words in the control group as these items remained the least preferred item in the relevant cluster. Therefore, in the experimental group learners’ perceptions were changed regarding their feedback on these items.
References
Adams, F. H. (2013). Using the jigsaw technique as an effective way of promoting cooperative learning among primary six pupils in Fijai. International journal of education and practice, 1(6), 64-74. 10.18488/journal.61/2013.1.6/61.6.64.74
Alghonaim, A. S. (2020). Impact of Related Activities on Reading Comprehension of EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 15-27. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt
Al-Qahtani, A. A. (2016). Why do Saudi EFL readers exhibit poor reading abilities? English Language and Literature Studies, 6(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ells.v6n1p1
Al Roomy, M., & Alhawsawi, S. (2019). Understanding Reading Strategies of EFL Saudi Students. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 33-44. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt
Al-Shboul, M. M., Ahmad, I. S., Nordin, M. S., & Rahman, Z. A. (2013). Foreign language anxiety and achievement: Systematic review. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(2), 32.http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n2p32
Al-Shumaimeri, Yousif A. (2009). Gender differences in reading comprehension performance in relation to the content familiarity of gender-neutral texts. Al-Masbah: Educational Journal - Kuwait: 24(93) http://yarab.yabesh.ir/yarab/handle/yad/72101
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stepan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, N. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. (2nd ed.). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Bolukbas, F., Keskin, F., & Polat, M. (2011). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning on the Reading Comprehension Skills in Turkish as a Foreign Language. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 330-335. http://www.tojet.net
Ameiratrini, T. (2017). The Use of Jigsaw Strategy in Improving Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension at the First Grade of Sman 1 Abung Selatan. http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/27915
Blaney, N. T., Stephan, C., Rosenfield, D., Aronson, E., & Sikes, J. (1977). Interdependence in the classroom: A field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(2), 121-128. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.69.2.121
Bay, E., & Çetin, B. (2012). Development of cooperative learning process scale (CLPS). Journal of Human Sciences, 9(1), 1063–1075. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/2057
Çelik, F. (2006). Objectives and new trends in goal settings in the Turkish Education System. Demirel University Burdur Faculty of Education Journal, 7(11), 1-15.
Chandran, Y., & Shah, P. M. (2019). Identifying learners’ difficulties in ESL reading comprehension. Creative Education, 10(13), 3372-3384. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013259
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. In The role of fluency in reading competence, assessment, and instruction (pp. 239-256). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
Gurbuz, N., Simsek, U., & Berber, K. (2015). Effect of cooperative learning model on the academic success of students at 6th-grade social studies lesson. Kafkas University, e-Journal of Caucasus Educational Research 2(1), 19–27. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kafkasegt/issue/19195/204095
Hassan, I. J., & Dweik, B. S. (2021). Factors and challenges in English reading comprehension among young Arab EFL Learners. Academic Research International, 12(1), 18-30. http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.12(1)/ARInt.2021(12.1-02).pdf
Hezam, T. A., Ali, J. K. M., Imtiaz, S., Saifi, M. A., & Islam, M. R. (2022). Challenges and problems of reading comprehension experienced by EFL learners. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 1(2), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v1i2.28
Joo, K. Y., & Damron, J. (2015). Foreign language reading anxiety: Korean as a foreign language in the United States. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 17(1), 23-48. http://www.ncolctl.org/files/Foreign-Language.pdf
Karacop, A., & Diken, E. H. (2017). The Effects of Jigsaw Technique Based on Cooperative Learning on Prospective Science Teachers' Science Process Skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 86-97. http://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP
Kanama, P., Siriwan, M., & Prasongsook, S. (2020). Improvement of English Reading Comprehension by Using the Jigsaw Technique for Grade 6 students. Mahasarakham Rajabhat University Journal 14(1), 165-174. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rmuj/article/view/241938
Khan, R. M. I., Shahbaz, M., Kumar, T., & Khan, I. (2020). Investigating reading challenges faced by EFL learners at the elementary level. Register Journal, 13(2), 277-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.277-292
Meng, J. (2010). Jigsaw cooperative learning in English reading. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 1(4). https://academypublication.com/issues/past/jltr/vol01/04/29.pdf
Qrqez, M., & Ab Rashid. R. (. (2019). The sources of reading comprehension difficulties among Saudi EFL learners. Trends in Social Sciences, 1(1), 7-16. http://eprints.unisza.edu.my/id/eprint/6351
Saulnier, B. M. (2009). From “sage on the stage” to “guide on the side” revisited: (un) covering the content in the learner-centered information systems course. Information Systems Education Journal, 7(60), 1-10. http://isedj.org/7/60/
Tanapanyaworakul, M. W., & Koowuttayakorn, S. (2020). Improving reading comprehension of EFL students using the jigsaw technique (Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University). http://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2020/TU_2020_6221040394_14235_13994.pdf
Winten, K. A. D. E. K. (2013). Improving reading comprehension through the jigsaw technique to the eighth-grade students of SMPN Satu Atap Jungutan in the academic year 2012/2013. Unpublished master thesis, Mahasaraswati Denpasar University, Bali, Indonesia.
Zemni, B., & Alrefaee, Y. (2021). Investigating the source of reading anxiety among undergraduate Saudi female EFL students in translation departments. TESOL International Journal, 15(5), 65-77. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3760193
Zhou, J. (2017). Foreign language reading anxiety in a Chinese as a foreign language context. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29(1), 155–173. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/66732